A casino which refuses to pay a jackpot
![]()
17 August 2008
What would you do with a million dollars? It's a question we've all pondered at one time or another. For Aurea Privee, she could smell the sweetness of the bills being fanned in front of her face. She was so close to a million dollars that she could literally taste it. But close only counts in horseshoes, unfortunately, and Privee's million-dollar dream quickly turned into a poor man's nightmare.
Aurea Privee walked into the Fiesta Casino in Henderson and started playing the penny video poker machines. The retired Privee had an ongoing relationship with the Fiesta casino; mostly of the give-give variety. Privee played the machines, but rarely won. Privee claims she spent twenty minutes between her regular bingo games dropping her pennies into a video poker machine. After a string of mediocre hands, Privee finally caught the hand of a lifetime.
The buzzers sounded, the coins dropped, and hearts raced as Privee had suddenly hit the one-million dollar and eight-two cent jackpot. Excited to be Nevada's newest millionaire, Privee was attempting to retrieve her money when an agent from the Nevada Gaming Control Board showed up unexpectedly. Upon “careful” examination, the agent found that the machine's maximum jackpot was supposedly set at $20,000, $980,000 shy of Privees prize. So, why would a machine set at $20,000 spit out $1,000,000? It's a question Privee wanted answered.
After the casino's insistence that the machine malfunctioned and that the $1,000,000 prize was a fabrication of Privee's vision, her husband quickly showed the photos he had taken of the million-dollar jackpot in two places. The gaming control agent claimed that the real prize was only $800. Rather than take a lesser prize, Privee put her trust in attorney Nikolas Mastrangelo.
The attorney asks the question we all want to know. If the machine supposedly malfunctioned, what exactly was the malfunction? The fact that the casino cannot answer this question only lends credibility to multiple conspiracy theories which imply that casinos never intend for you to win a progressive jackpot. The fact that it happened wasn't covered up at all. The casino stated that it was in fact a “malfunction.” Now, it's up to the casino to correctly define the word malfunction to the rest of its casino goers - which doesn't seem likely.
Finally, the casino blamed the malfunction on their lack of software upgrades, which makes it a human error (for not manually upgrading) and not a mechanical error, which means Privee is entitled to the prize; a taste of the casino's own technicality medicine. But that's not the case at all. The case seems clear-cut to many observes, and the line between malfunction and negligence is quite broad, yet too transparent to hide behind.
To date, Aurea Privee is still waiting for her case to be heard by the Gaming Board. Hypothetically, she stands a chance, but in actuality, she has the same chance of getting her money as she does of hitting another million-dollar progressive jackpot. If irony paid off, Privee would be set for life.
Aurea Privee walked into the Fiesta Casino in Henderson and started playing the penny video poker machines. The retired Privee had an ongoing relationship with the Fiesta casino; mostly of the give-give variety. Privee played the machines, but rarely won. Privee claims she spent twenty minutes between her regular bingo games dropping her pennies into a video poker machine. After a string of mediocre hands, Privee finally caught the hand of a lifetime.
The buzzers sounded, the coins dropped, and hearts raced as Privee had suddenly hit the one-million dollar and eight-two cent jackpot. Excited to be Nevada's newest millionaire, Privee was attempting to retrieve her money when an agent from the Nevada Gaming Control Board showed up unexpectedly. Upon “careful” examination, the agent found that the machine's maximum jackpot was supposedly set at $20,000, $980,000 shy of Privees prize. So, why would a machine set at $20,000 spit out $1,000,000? It's a question Privee wanted answered.
After the casino's insistence that the machine malfunctioned and that the $1,000,000 prize was a fabrication of Privee's vision, her husband quickly showed the photos he had taken of the million-dollar jackpot in two places. The gaming control agent claimed that the real prize was only $800. Rather than take a lesser prize, Privee put her trust in attorney Nikolas Mastrangelo.
The attorney asks the question we all want to know. If the machine supposedly malfunctioned, what exactly was the malfunction? The fact that the casino cannot answer this question only lends credibility to multiple conspiracy theories which imply that casinos never intend for you to win a progressive jackpot. The fact that it happened wasn't covered up at all. The casino stated that it was in fact a “malfunction.” Now, it's up to the casino to correctly define the word malfunction to the rest of its casino goers - which doesn't seem likely.
Finally, the casino blamed the malfunction on their lack of software upgrades, which makes it a human error (for not manually upgrading) and not a mechanical error, which means Privee is entitled to the prize; a taste of the casino's own technicality medicine. But that's not the case at all. The case seems clear-cut to many observes, and the line between malfunction and negligence is quite broad, yet too transparent to hide behind.
To date, Aurea Privee is still waiting for her case to be heard by the Gaming Board. Hypothetically, she stands a chance, but in actuality, she has the same chance of getting her money as she does of hitting another million-dollar progressive jackpot. If irony paid off, Privee would be set for life.
Tags: jackpot, video poker, aurea privee, fiesta casino, henderson, nevada gaming control board,
Posted In: Land Based Casinos, Jackpot Winners,
Get More With Our Newsletter
| Fill out the form on the right to join our CasinoMan newsletter and we'll drop you an email every 2 weeks with the latest blog posts. We'll also periodically send you other useful gambling articles we publish which will keep you completely informed of the latest offers. This newsletter goes out 1 time per month. Naturally, we respect your privacy. |
Share it
Latest Blogs
- A future perspective on online slot machines
Date: 04 February 2012 - Is Rival Casinos going to fall over and die?
Date: 03 February 2012 - Legal update of regulation in Online Gambling in Denmark
Date: 01 February 2012 - Profiting from the profiteers - How the US Government are planning to tax online gambling when it regulates
Date: 30 January 2012 - The real reason why online gambling was banned
Date: 28 January 2012 - What are the biggest attractions at this Year’s ICE show in London
Date: 27 January 2012 - Which US States will move first to allow online gambling in 2012
Date: 25 January 2012 - A laymans explanation of the Wire Act of 1961 and how it is affecting online gambling today
Date: 23 January 2012 - How to deal with non-paying online casinos
Date: 21 January 2012 - Will online gambling take off on the ipad?
Date: 20 January 2012
| 1) | 100% | |
| 2) | 100% | |
| 3) | 100% | |
| 4) | 100% | |
| 5) | 100% | |
| 6) | 100% | |
| 7) | 100% | |
| 8) | 100% | |
| 9) | 100% | |
| 10) | 100% |
Blog Tags
francis ford coppola amancio ortega gaona city suite married night gallery river festival rendezvous do not disturb swimming pool classic ford ritz hotel paris manhattan express roller coaster five star hotels aida bulgari virgin gorda outlet shopping tour michael schumacher manhattan private helicopter helder rodrigues
Casino of the Month
Each month we give special recognition to an online casino which has excelled. This month our online casino of choice is:
InterCasino
BONUS: 100% free up to £250 for new depositors






Readers Comments
Michael - 15 November 2009